Curse

Lord of Fiery Doom · Feb 27, 2007, 05:58 PM // 17:58

OK people, thans for all the feedback. I'm not a techie, but I'm kind of getting the fact that there is a lot of work to be done, if this is going to be even considered. Now my shop has definately been pooh-poohed due to this and that, so now I ask: Has anybody got a reasonable idea that can solve the spamming?

Tarun · Feb 27, 2007, 06:16 PM // 18:16

Your idea is fine, do not become deterred by those who lack the knowledge of programming and networking. Replicant is 100% correct that an idle shop will take up far less bandwidth and hardware resources.

broodijzer · Feb 27, 2007, 06:22 PM // 18:22

Idea isn't bad, but if you're looking for 1 item, you have to browse through 100s of shops before you find it. Unless every item is indexed, it's going to be a pain to find the item you want. Result = Auction house..

Peter Acid Eater · Feb 27, 2007, 06:34 PM // 18:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by broodijzer

Idea isn't bad, but if you're looking for 1 item, you have to browse through 100s of shops before you find it. Unless every item is indexed, it's going to be a pain to find the item you want. Result = Auction house..

I think that's the biggest crux of the matter. I think the shop idea is good, but without a search feature for it, it's just another function that people won't use.

Really, if ANet made the spam blocker function more stringent, (ie: a verbatim post is blocked if posted within 3 seconds) This would make spamming much more difficult and might actually force traders to use the Search menu.

I've actually enforced my own form of passive influence by refusing to deal with spam posters and buying solely from Search posters.

Tarun · Feb 27, 2007, 07:31 PM // 19:31

The Search feature sucks for selling. You cannot enter enough descriptive text.

pork soldier · Feb 27, 2007, 08:31 PM // 20:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tarun

Ever heard of the fact that not all servers run on the same hardware? Basic Networking 101.

Town lag in silkroad had *zero* to do with server hardware and everything to do with the client machine choking on the amount of graphical crap it had to display.

If you really wanted to fix lag in one of those games you'd go to a crappy LOD on all of the avatars' models when in town, which is exactly what guildwars does...

Drazaar · Feb 28, 2007, 12:39 AM // 00:39

/signed

I played ROSE before here when it was in Beta and I liked that ability even with lag. Perhaps a way to help avoid lag though would be to have a seperate area dedicated to this?

Like open the map area and click the ship and where theres LA, Kamadan, Kaineng and Temple of Balthazar they add "Merchant Isle" or some such stuff like that? And thats where you have the option to open shop or simply browse?

or perhaps it can be found when we open the map in the Battle Isles section.

Aeon_Xin · Feb 28, 2007, 12:43 AM // 00:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord of Fiery Doom

OK people, thans for all the feedback. I'm not a techie, but I'm kind of getting the fact that there is a lot of work to be done, if this is going to be even considered. Now my shop has definately been pooh-poohed due to this and that, so now I ask: Has anybody got a reasonable idea that can solve the spamming?

I'ave alrady posted mine several times(dont't know if I did here), but here it goes again, for posterity or something, and since you asked.

1. Increase "Search" character limit to that of normal chat.

2. Seperate whisper from normal chat, so that it does not scroll up with everything else.

3. Get Excessive messages WAY more easily, and flat out block WTS, WT$
W T S, W_T_S(my personal favorite), and all other very common variations of that and WTB, or atleast send them ALL to trade channel, like WTS is now.

4. Mute abusers. If you get Excessive messaging more than once in one minute, you're muted on public/trade channel for 2 minutes.

The other reasons I don't sign for, People already will spend an hour selling junk, when in that time they could have farmed that much worth of gold alone(or way more), not to mention drops. The ability to AFK sell, the number of people in a given place would skyrocket, because it's not only the active people, it's the number of people that play the game. People will packrat and sell more total crap, and do it 24/7. Alot of your "stop whining about bandwidth" people really don't get the potentially massive amount of information that gets to be. They lack the ability to grasp the big picture.

Where do megabytes come from? Lots of kb and single bytes. It all adds up.

I could care less about the spare change in just my couch, let it rot there, bit if someone were to offer me all the spare change in every GW players couch, I'd have some extra money to upgrade my computer with, ram and hard drives at the very least.
(probably more because hardcore gamers tend to not clean house as much as normal people with a life.....but then again maybe that equals out with dark basement gamers that never leave the house and hence do not aquire alot of pocket change.)

Peter Panic · Feb 28, 2007, 01:51 AM // 01:51

I can see a few things wrong with your idea.
Firstly, making your own personal store with set prices would pretty much eliminate all bargaining. i cant tell you how many times ive gone to sell someting and spammed for 25k when i really intended to sell it for 20k or less. Most people find an item they want, and make a lower offer, then they go back and forth untill a price is settled.
Second, this system would make district 1 and 2 of lions arch, kamadan, kaening, and other major selling cities unusable for everyone without a 50000 dollar alieware or some other ridiculous setup
dont get me wrong, Im all for a way to stop the WTB/WTS spams, but I feel that we should think everything through and work out every kink we can find so we dont fix one thing only to bring up a bigger problem or annoyence.

bilateralrope · Feb 28, 2007, 03:03 AM // 03:03

This idea would still require people to be standing around to sell stuff. My main complaint about the current system is that I'd prefer to be out actually playing guild wars instead of attempting to trade, and since my computer has a loud fan I prefer to turn it off at night, so AFKing overnight isn't really an option either (especially for people with monthly bandwidth limits). Though if you instead set the price and a single NPC took the item and operated as the shop for everyone across all of Guild Wars it would solve this and many of the other problems people mentioned, as long as the NPC had a decent searching system to filter out the stuff you don't currently want to buy.

The only problem I still see with this is how much work it will be for inexperienced traders to decide what price to sell for. Now there are two solutions for this:
1 - Provide a history showing how much similar items have sold for in the past, and have the seller to look it up. This would involve the seller having to search for the stats of various items with similar stats, then having to estimate how much the weapons mods added to the unmodded price of those variants, then estimate how much the mods on his weapon will alter its price. Then decide on the price and hope its not either too low (someone will buy his cheap weapon, then resell it at a higher price) or too high (it simply won't sell).
2 - Implement an Auction House where, as long as the starting bid is set at or below the actual value with a decent auction duration, the seller will get a fair price for the weapon as the buyers bid the price up.

/unsigned in favor of an Auction house.

Replicant · Feb 28, 2007, 05:49 AM // 05:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aeon_Xin

You played Knight Online, and you said it had very little lag? You're definately on crack.

OK, you've proved you can do math, based on your 36 byte line, big whoop.

I load into LA D1.
That server has to send me everyones 36 byte line, plus the inventory from their store.

36 * X + (X * Y[number of items in store, byte equivalent, say 10 for a full store])

You say 150 people. I say way more, because when AFK sales happens tons of people pack rat everything to sell while they're asleep or at work.

36 * 250 +( 250 * 8)
74k.
Big whoop, even on my DSL that's like 3 seconds downloading.

Now, on D1 LA, every 3-4 seconds(and I'm being generous, it's less time) Someone enters the town. Anet then has to send 74k to each and every one of them, on top of all the info already needed(what people, what armors, what color for armors, all that jazz, what minipet is out, and where each person and minipet are moving to, in adition to NPC's if there happen to be roamers there.)

Anet is suddenly having to send out megabytes worth of info per server(each district is not run on it's own server, in case someone wants to go there).
That creates lag, period.

Yes, you can do some simple math, but you're not counting the massive amount of people that anet has to relay that 36 bytes to AND from(plus how often), not to mention every inventory change and new store, in addition to what's there already.

I really hate to keep de-railing this thread. but i had to say this..

Aeon_Xin, go back to my post and read..... "IF people are forced to go to a "Market Place" district... or... could only have 10 people AFK with Stores per district."

now.. 10 is a really low number in my opinion... and would hope anet if they added this would make it atleast 50 or so.

now... where exactly do you get the idea that you HAVE to receive the data for what every store has.... why not call a function when you open the store to get the data then... oh wait.. that would destroy your argument..

Anet already does this too btw, open a rune merchant and what happens? oh.. thats right, you start receiving the data for whats on the merchant then.. you can see this especially on the rune traders, when as soon as you open you get the data for the 50 or so runes, the price, and what icon to use.

i'm too tired to continue (stayed up all night and all day working on my remote administration tool) but feel free to throw up more random numbers and excuses, cause i already bet any of you people whining about "lag" would use this system anyways.

Aeon_Xin · Feb 28, 2007, 09:16 AM // 09:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Replicant

I really hate to keep de-railing this thread. but i had to say this..

Aeon_Xin, go back to my p................
tired to continue (stayed up all night and all day working on my remote administration tool) but feel free to throw up more random numbers and excuses, cause i already bet any of you people whining about "lag" would use this system anyways.

Limiting ten player ran "shops" to a district? Freaking lol, great way to reduce the lag that would be there. Even 50 would be ridiculously low.
Now in addition to having to sort through the crap people think they deserve my coin for, I have to district jump like crazy to do it too.

ok, to boil it down so even you can understand it.

Anet now deals with X amount of info, the current state of the game.
When you add information that needs to go to any user, you take up more bandwidth, unless Anet and GW players are magically gifted with clairvoyance of course. We all know that's a distinct possibility.

I'm not saying Lag is guaranteed, but that it's highly possible. GW has an edge on many games by not having much lag at all that I've noticed, and I'm on a semi-crappy "broadband". I'd rather keep it the efficient machine that it is.

That being said.

"Anet already does this too btw, open a rune merchant and what happens? oh.. thats right, you start receiving the data for whats on the merchant then.."

[[[As if the list of runes changes daily. This code is likely sent in a few bytes. A yes/no (1/0) for each rune to see if it's in stock and that's all you get, but the list is ALWAYS the same(exception of expansion/chapter and other applicable updates)]]]]

"you can see this especially on the rune traders, when as soon as you open you get the data for the 50 or so runes, the price, and what icon to use."

You don't get the current price, you get a price guide, that sometimes doesn't change all day if you don't get a quote(sometimes doesn't even change if you get a quote, close, then reopen)
I think the price list is downloaded once daily(or at city loading time) for a rough estimate. You get the real price when you get a buy/sell quote.

What icon to use? Now I know you're BS'n your way through this. As if the icons for runes and dyes change, ever.....(see above exception on updates)

I suppose Merchants send out all sorts of data and what icons to use too right? Lets See Player X wants to use the Merchant, well, "I have A salvage kit, oh, it looks like this, and it costs this much, I also have....."

Most Icons have nothing to do with what data is transmitted. They're tied to an action, or a line of code. The Icon for Red Dye shows up in my inventory, because my client was told that I have a red dye, not because my client was told I have a red dye AND the red dye uses this Icon.( FOW armor, whatever runes or items, that's how it works)

If a person's "store" were to emulate the vendors that exist, they'd have to send out their inventory to everyone ahead of time, IE, when I enter the city.

Why do I know this? Because very time there's a change in what a vendor carries or doesn't carry, there's an update before you even get into the game.
The lists are stored client side, even runes. The only thing that changes is weather or not a Rune/Dye vendors have it in stock. Very simple 1/0 lists are asked for/sent upon opening a vendor and that's all.(or should be if it's not that simple)

Unless you know better of course, and are actually involved with writing the code for GW. Judging from the way you talk I'd assume you aren't, and thank god for that, or this would be another Knight Online or worse, likely much worse.

Every one else: Sorry to rant/flame, but I'm not one for saying "This is the way it is because you don't know better" and it really irks me when people pretty much shoot stuff out their bung and call it "something 101"

Swampgirl Inez · Feb 28, 2007, 03:52 PM // 15:52

Let's get back on the subject of fine-tuning the suggestion rather than picking each other's arguements apart and flaming, shall we?

Lord of Fiery Doom · Feb 28, 2007, 06:28 PM // 18:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swampgirl Inez

Let's get back on the subject of fine-tuning the suggestion rather than picking each other's arguements apart and flaming, shall we?

Ah, thank you.

Carmina · Feb 28, 2007, 07:40 PM // 19:40

/signed

I'd personally rather see it similar to the current "looking for party" screen. Drag the item you want to sell, it's description goes into a global "trying to sell" system broken down by sword, bow, mini-pet, crafting supplies, dye, etc. When you enter an item it asks how much you're selling for.

If there's 100 Eternal Bows, obviously the lowest bid will sell first, you let you item sit around until it eventually sells - or doesn't. It's one slot, who cares if someone uses it as storage.

If the item sells, the buyer gets the item, the seller gets the gold, items, whatever. Obviously, ecto will have to be programmed as an acceptable means of currency unless the store will allow larger than 100k transactions.

Captain Dingo · Mar 01, 2007, 02:02 AM // 02:02

I've always thought we should be allowed to report people for trying to buy or sell in the Local channel.

Policing the situation and inciting fear in the morons that keep spamming Local would be effective, in my opinion.

Personally, I plan on trying to reduce these bad traders as much as possible using in-game techniques and limitations. Lately I've been humoring people who are selling things via the Local channel, wasting their time saying "Whoops, let me just go get my 100k+ectos!" then when I get back to them, I pretend to have a revelation, and say "Wait, weren't you spamming this in the Local channel? Sorry, I don't buy from Local spammers."

Thereby setting an example for them. :P

But I'm a very blunt person and it's easy for me to do that to people. Not that they don't deserve it. There are new people in this game who are trying to get questions answered and trying to speak to others in a district, and it's impossible to do so with all those inconsiderate Runescape kiddies screaming about wanting to sell their Kuunavangs. There's a reason we turned off Trade - We're not buying anything.

Perfected Shadow · Mar 01, 2007, 02:40 AM // 02:40

So you played MU global huh, well then you should remember Server 1/2 (iirc) Lorencia where most of the afk shopkeepers/sellers were 24/7. You should recall the HORRIBLE LAG too and when people set up shop right in front of yours effectively blocking the view. I still favor WoW's auction house because with MU I got really sick of leaving the comp on, wasting power, etc just to sell crap.

cyberjanet · Mar 01, 2007, 11:43 AM // 11:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Dingo

I've always thought we should be allowed to report people for trying to buy or sell in the Local channel.

It often happens that I have to turn the Local Channel off in towns because the spam is unbearable. Having shops and shopping areas will be as useful in stopping the spam as the Trade Channel. There is a facility there, but the spammers don't use because they can't believe nobody wants to buy their Victo's Sword for 35k. You know what? I really don"t want it! And if I did want it, I'd look in Trade.

My suggestion is an antispammer command that ordinary people can use. When someone starts spamming, you send him an antispam message and he gets sent off to watch a one minute noskip video of how to use the Trade Channel.

Of course, to stop this being abused by the underage idiots with a stupid sense of humour, the antispam command would only take effect once a certain number have been received, say ten or so, each from different people.

MithranArkanere · Mar 01, 2007, 03:01 PM // 15:01

They could combine the new party seach featur with AFK shops.

1. Limit number of shops per district.
2. Limit the places where shops can be set. For example, in kaineng city, they'll have to be set in the always empty Back alley, not in the middle.
3. Make impossible to set the shop over another shop (with a message, not by bodybloking: "You can't set your shop so near another shop"). The distance should be enough so models do not overlap, not more.
4. When settting a shop, the description will show in the Search Party Window too. They will have another icon showing that.
5. When inviting a character with a shop set, instead of moving the character to you, you'll move to the character.
6. Each shop would have a limited ammount of slots to sell. So people will put their stock in the shop name. Additional slots could be purchased to Xunlai Representatives or in the GW Shop.

Pros?
- AFK selling, an AFK player will not spam, if he does he's using any kind of bot or automated system to, thus breaking rules.
- People will try to use descriptive names in order to get more sells, people would check first 'Ectos, Greens, Trophies' instead of 'look at this'.
- No haggling (pro for the seller).

Cons
- No haggling (con for the buyer).

Another idea could be...
Instead of trading districts, they should put trading outposts, the market in Kaineng, Lion's Arch in Kryta, the Bazaar in Vabbi...
THey could be the only places with Trade chat, and trading in outposts out of thouse would mean warnings, temporal bannings, etc..

VorBiz · Mar 01, 2007, 05:35 PM // 17:35

I think it is a good. A few things I can think of is ( I have only read the 1st page so sorry for anything that has already been said)...

When the shop is up, you cant move, talk, look around. This will stop spaming, trying to get people looking at ur shop ect.

Have a Dist just for this, eg, Droks dis 1 - Droks trading Dis 1 (Or something like that.)

Let people make a shop in any town - Let them make one in Yaks for e.g, for the lowler level players, then they can work there way up. (Maybe not in Coop's, like RoF ect ect.

Bad points I can think of is,This will kill places like LA, Droks and other "Trading" towns.

Will take a while of looking around to find what wep you want, maybe having a search for what you want. E.G - Sword, Req 9 - max dmg - gold - 15^50, ect ect. (Although, this is going more into the WoW Auction Houses imo, It will still be good for all GW Players.)

/Signed